Search for: All records

Abstract Ecological communities frequently exhibit remarkable taxonomic and trait diversity, and this diversity is consistently shown to regulate ecosystem function and resilience. However, ecologists lack a synthetic theory for how this diversity is maintained when species compete for limited resources, hampering our ability to project the future of biodiversity under climate change. Water‐limited plant communities are an ideal system in which to study these questions given (1) the diversity of hydraulic traits they exhibit, (2) the importance of this diversity for ecosystem productivity and drought resilience, and (3) forecast changes to precipitation and evapotranspiration under climate change. We developed an analytically tractable model of water and light competition in age‐structured perennial plant communities and demonstrated that high diversity is maintained through phenological division of the time between storms. We modeled a system where water arrives in the form of intermittent storms, between which plants consume the limited pool of soil water until it becomes dry enough that they must physiologically shut down to avoid embolism. Competition occurs because individuals, by consuming the shared water pool, cause their competitors to shut down earlier, harming their long‐term growth and reproduction. When total precipitation is low, plants in the model compete only for water. However, increases in precipitation can cause the canopy to close and individuals to begin competing for light. Variation among species in the minimum soil water content at which they can sustain growth without embolizing leads to emergent phenological variation, as species will shut down at varying points between storm events. When this variation is paired with a trade‐off such that species that shut down early are compensated by faster biomass accumulation, higher fecundity, or lower mortality, there is no limit to the number that can coexist. These results are robust to variation in both total precipitation and the time between storms. The model therefore offers a plausible explanation for how hydraulic trait diversity is maintained in a wide array of natural systems. More broadly, this work illustrates how the phenological division of an apparently singular resource can emerge because of common trade‐offs and ultimately foster high taxonomic and trait diversity. 

Abstract Understanding how diversity is maintained in plant communities requires that we first understand the mechanisms of competition for limiting resources. In ecology, there is an underappreciated but fundamental distinction between systems in which the depletion of limiting resources reduces the growth rates of competitors and systems in which resource depletion reduces the time available for competitors to grow, a mechanism we call ‘competition for time’. Importantly, modern community ecology and our framing of the coexistence problem are built on the implicit assumption that competition reduces the growth rate. However, recent theoretical work suggests competition for time may be the predominant competitive mechanism in a broad array of natural communities, a significant advance given that when species compete for time, diversity‐maintaining trade‐offs emerge organically. In this study, we first introduce competition for time conceptually using a simple model of interacting species. Then, we perform an experiment in a Mediterranean annual grassland to determine whether competition for time is an important competitive mechanism in a field system. Indeed, we find that species respond to increased competition through reductions in their lifespan rather than their rate of growth. In total, our study suggests competition for time may be overlooked as a mechanism of biodiversity maintenance. 

Accurate estimation of forest biomass is important for scientists and policymakers interested in carbon accounting, nutrient cycling, and forest resilience. Estimates often rely on the allometry of trees; however, limited datasets, uncertainty in model form, and unaccounted for sources of variation warrant a re-examination of allometric relationships using modern statistical techniques. We asked the following questions: (1) Is there among-stand variation in allometric relationships? (2) Is there nonlinearity in allometric relationships? (3) Can among-stand variation or nonlinearities in allometric equations be attributed to differences in stand age? (4) What are the implications for biomass estimation? To answer these questions, we synthesized a dataset of small trees from six different studies in the White Mountains of New Hampshire. We compared the performance of generalized additive models (GAMs) and linear models and found that GAMs consistently outperform linear models. The best-fitting model indicates that allometries vary among both stands and species and contain subtle nonlinearities which are themselves variable by species. Using a planned contrasts analysis, we were able to attribute some of the observed among-stand heterogeneity to differences in stand age. However, variability in these results point to additional sources of stand-level heterogeneity, which if identified could improve the accuracy of live-tree biomass estimation.